In their protest against a worldwide ban on psychotherapy that discusses your full sexual potential, the IFTTC aims its arrows against the biggest perpetrator of them all, the UN. Since 2014, a fringe of lay activists has seized hold of it. Flags wave at the New York headquarters but activists have turned it into the flagship of the Cancel Culture. Continue reading The international Declaration on Therapeutic Choice, part 4 of 5: “Cancel Culture at the United Nations”
In August 2018, the ‘California MassResistance’ movement applied unprecedented pressure to stop the horrible anti-therapy bill AB 2943. That legislation, if it passed, would have treated all forms of therapy for unwanted homosexuality or gender identity conflict as a fraudulent business practice.
Furthermore, it would have forbidden the sale and distribution of any materials teaching people about natural marriage, biological sexuality, gender, and affirmation of Biblical morality. This was a sweeping piece of legislation that worried churches, professionals, and pro-family activists in general.
On the last day of the session, the author of the bill, Evan Low (D-Cupertino) pulled the bill from the floor. To explain his move, he announced that he would be re-filing the bill in the 2019 session. In this article, we show what makes his clock tick. Continue reading The international declaration on therapeutic choice, part 3 of 5: “Activists, what makes their clock tick?”
Fake news reigns supreme. There are two influencers in the current society who abundantly make use of what we moderate activists call the “Putin Putsch”, namely Vladimir Putin and our radicalized emancipation colleagues. Vladimir has become good at it after years of experience, and in the USA, our radicalized colleagues are runner-up. How does it work and why is it harmful to people struggling with their sexual feelings and aspirations? Continue reading The international declaration on therapeutic choice, part 2 of 5: “The twists of truth”
In April 2022, the International Federation For Therapeutic And Counseling Choice issued a declaration to counteract the narrative about bans that the radicalized factions of the emancipation movement are trying to write into law. These extremists are seducing lawmakers to criminalize all mention of the opposite sex when dealing with persons labeled “gay”. They do it by hook or by crook. The subject is never to be brought up again, so they feel, because mentioning the opposite sex is portrayed as “harmful”. What does the International Federation have to say in retaliation, and why do they say this? Continue reading The International Declaration on Therapeutic Choice, part 1 of 5: “The Attacks On Self-determination”