In their protest against a worldwide ban on psychotherapy that discusses your full sexual potential, the IFTTC aims its arrows against the biggest perpetrator of them all, the UN. Since 2014, a fringe of lay activists has seized hold of it. Flags wave at the New York headquarters but activists have turned it into the flagship of the Cancel Culture. Continue reading The international Declaration on Therapeutic Choice, part 4 of 5: “Cancel Culture at the United Nations”
On the website “Russian Faith”, we read that the US Gay Liberation Army is hijacking ‘Mailchimp’. This is a database service for any website. It can be programmed to inform subscribers automatically via email of a new blog or an email campagne. The policy of this service appears to have been hijacked by activists. Mailchimp can now be added to the ever-growing list of the Cancel Culture in the USA. ‘Woke’ reigns supreme. Continue reading Russian Faith Christian Site Attacked by $700 Million ‘Woke’ Megacorporation: Mailchimp
In August 2018, the ‘California MassResistance’ movement applied unprecedented pressure to stop the horrible anti-therapy bill AB 2943. That legislation, if it passed, would have treated all forms of therapy for unwanted homosexuality or gender identity conflict as a fraudulent business practice.
Furthermore, it would have forbidden the sale and distribution of any materials teaching people about natural marriage, biological sexuality, gender, and affirmation of Biblical morality. This was a sweeping piece of legislation that worried churches, professionals, and pro-family activists in general.
On the last day of the session, the author of the bill, Evan Low (D-Cupertino) pulled the bill from the floor. To explain his move, he announced that he would be re-filing the bill in the 2019 session. In this article, we show what makes his clock tick. Continue reading The international declaration on therapeutic choice, part 3 of 5: “Activists, what makes their clock tick?”
Fake news reigns supreme. There are two influencers in the current society who abundantly make use of what we moderate activists call the “Putin Putsch”, namely Vladimir Putin and our radicalized emancipation colleagues. Vladimir has become good at it after years of experience, and in the USA, our radicalized colleagues are runner-up. How does it work and why is it harmful to people struggling with their sexual feelings and aspirations? Continue reading The international declaration on therapeutic choice, part 2 of 5: “The twists of truth”
In April 2022, the International Federation For Therapeutic And Counseling Choice issued a declaration to counteract the narrative about bans that the radicalized factions of the emancipation movement are trying to write into law. These extremists are seducing lawmakers to criminalize all mention of the opposite sex when dealing with persons labeled “gay”. They do it by hook or by crook. The subject is never to be brought up again, so they feel, because mentioning the opposite sex is portrayed as “harmful”. What does the International Federation have to say in retaliation, and why do they say this? Continue reading The International Declaration on Therapeutic Choice, part 1 of 5: “The Attacks On Self-determination”
Beliefs in “changelings” are as old as the hills. In every culture and civilization, rumors were whispered of a secret true self, gradually issuing forth into the lives of a small group of exceptional people: the emerging of “changelings”. Rational science would seem to have tackled these flings of imagination. But they are back. Two decades of radical-gay activism are shaping the moral landscape. Everyone is to feel new sentiments that “changelings’ do indeed dwell among us. How does this well orchestrated and frantic campaign intrude on your efforts to come to grips with your feelings? Continue reading Exploring your full sexual potential, part 38: ‘The ancient myths of changelings”
The proposed bill makes wrong assumptions, violates therapeutic standards, and contributes to further neglect. Above all, it does not tackle or scrutinize the highly contested gay-affirming and gender-affirming therapies. In doing so, the NZ youth is not being protected but one-sidedly handed over to the whims of the day, after which the book on the subject is closed. Continue reading The harm caused by a therapy ban in NZ, part 8 of 8: “Bad legislation”
The most harmful drawback of the proposed NZ legislation is that it will no longer be legitimate to talk to younger people in-depth about homosexuality. No more searching for answers, no more looking under the hood of the car or lifting the car up, only a ready-made identity to slip into, flags to wave, and parades to attend. Each therapist who is sincere, aims to create room for content, not to tackle society, but to help the client ask him/herself: what the hell am I doing?. Continue reading The harm caused by a therapy ban in NZ, part 7 of 8: “The new taboo is harmful”
The proposed legislation is not an ultimate solution for mental health care, it will become the ultimate problem. There are four backlash issues that inevitably must lead to professional condemnation of this fear-mongering. Can we already predict undesirable dramas stemming from this bill? Yes. And have they been taken into account? No. The Bill aims to induce a chilling effect on dissidence. To this end, the notion of thought crimes is introduced. More than 10.000 individuals in NZ have written a letter of protest. The professional mental health community is under siege. Continue reading The harm caused by a therapy ban in NZ, part 6 of 8: “The emergence of backlashes”
At the EU summit dinner table in Brussels in June 2021, emotions got high as several long-time EU member‑states tried to bully the Hungarian nation into canceling a recent law. Hungary wants to protect minors from being fed incorrect information without parental knowledge or consent about sexuality and the recently hyped transdelusion. Hungarian people realize that they have so little grip on matters of upbringing that it takes state power to forge space for parental involvement. They now pay the price as radicalized LGBT-activists in the EU parliament (most notably activist Sophie in ‘t Velt, NL) try to stigmatize Hungary’s majority wish and to set Europe up against the government.