In 2019, science proved for once and for all that there is no genetic proof for the slogan ‘born that way”, that is to say, born with an exclusive potential for homosexual behavior and a total lack of heterosexual capacity. When studying sexuality, there are no genetic differences to be found between so-called “groups” who would have separate sexualities. Genetically identifiable groups do not exist.
To this end, the full genetic makeup of a half million random people in the US and the UK was chartered by a team of scientists. It was published in the magazine Science on the 4th of September 2019 by Benjamin Neale and 19 international colleagues.
“There is certainly no single genetic determinant for same-sex behavior (sometimes referred to as the “gay gene” in the media). All measured common variants do not allow meaningful prediction of an individual’s sexual preference. The researchers emphasize the importance of resisting simplistic conclusions”.Continue reading Science finds no genetic origin of homosexual behavior→
Little does the general population know the realities of life as a transgender. Gay-lib disinformation campaigns appear to deliberately keep everyone ignorant. Unfortunately, gender confusion is not a state of happy bliss in which an individual has supposedly become “who he is”. That is far too simple. It is an ongoing turbulent mental condition which consists of auto-aggressive behavior with an endlessly churning maelstrom of sadness, hatred and self-harm. Bystanders are paralyzed in their responses, beholding seemingly true Martians in their midst. The metamorphosis looks human and yet non-human, or at least, not like me. Awestruck, the on-lookers know no reflex but to gaze. Continue reading Gender Identity Confusion, part 2: “The Realities Of Suicides”→
In 1969, gay activist George Weinberg attributed an imaginary ‘phobia’ to people of any opposing view. Since then, a new term has risen on the horizon: ‘diversity’. If ‘Homophobia’ was strong language in 1969, the new-millenium-language is even stronger. This ‘diversity’ embraces everybody except, of course, the demonized and the persecuted who are not considered or defended as a part of the diversity spectrum. The flags are so big, that they can only be meant to tell others off and to be intimidating. What is this ‘Diversity’ anyway? Continue reading A unifying theory of the term ‘homophobia’, part 5: The Diversity Hoax→
With the nearing of yet again another activist ‘International Day Against Homophobia’ on May 17, the word ‘homophobia’ is central stage. But what to come up with this time? Usually, radical gay-lib highlights foreign legislation’s where homosexual acts between consenting adults are considered illegal. Gay-lib elicits rage by inciting the crowds with fantasies of people being tossed from walls by goggle-eyed imams, and as a result an irrational power emerges. As always, these strong feelings are then diverted to their own country for domestic use, even though homosexual behavior is not illegal in the West. With adrenaline now flowing through blood vessels, any objections to radical gay-lib campaigns in their own country can be hunted down and punished. Continue reading A unifying theory of the term ‘homophobia’, part 4: Gay-lib is running out of gas→
In this article, we will analyze how the radical factions within the Gay Liberation Front have evolved over the last five decades and have managed to monopolize public opinion and are seeking to marginalize all dissidence, even within the emancipation movement. Then we will suggest how persons with moderate views can regain the initiative for compassionate client care. Continue reading The Bastion Of Gay-lib Supremacy And Ways To Scale The Walls→
In this article, we will demonstrate the stigmatization, harassment and persecution of non-believers in the pro-gay stance. This is the belief that gay feelings should not be thought of as ‘unwanted’ by anyone but as desirable and ‘perfect’ (even God-given if you are religious). Therefore, no one has the right to investigate them. This is regarded as the ultimate truth and is reinforced by Orientation Theory, as we saw in the previous part. This stance leads to homosexism, a system of attitudes, bias, discrimination, and imprisonment of dissidents and apostates in favor of same-sex behavior and relationships. It is based on heterophobia, a deep-rooted irrational disgust and avoidance of intimacy with the opposite sex.
When we look at homosexual feelings as a complex, we first need to address the controversy created by the American Psychological Association. Their 2009 paper on the subject of psychotherapy did much harm. In this series, we will demonstrate the multitude of psychological phenomena to be observed when looking at the Gay Related Complex. But activists within the APA peddle their assertion that there is nothing in particular to be seen; homosexuality is an entity, so they claim, with nothing unusual going on. We will investigate the origins of the ‘homosexuality’ paradigm, demonstrate how the myths called ‘Orientation Theory’ and ‘Gender Theory’ are based on pseudo-science, and by comparing them to Racial Theory, demonstrate how harmful these recent theories are to the individual and to society. Continue reading The Gay Related Complex, part 6: The scam of Sexual Orientation→
The concept of sexual ‘orientations’ is merely a figure of speech. Orientations do not exist as actual biological entities, but through repetition and activism, they have come to live a life of their own in the minds of the general public. What we actually see is chronic fixations, not orientations. In this article, we will describe this approach to sexual syndromes, notably the Don Juan Syndrome and the Sadomasochist Syndrome. In part 5, we will expand this to describe Same Sex Attractions. Continue reading The Gay Related Complex, part 4: Sexual ‘Orientation’ is actually a Sexual ‘Fixation’→
Regular science understands homosexuality more than ever before. A whole complex of feelings and experiences can be identified which ultimately gives way to same-sex attractions. Before we analyze the Gay Related Complex, we need to look into the controversy with which radical gay-lib has confused the debate in the past three decades. Gay-lib has even created a science of its own, called LGBT-psychology. By boldly denying all underlying mechanisms, this frame of thought has led to therapeutic neglect. In this article, we will analyze the phenomenon, demonstrate how and why it is a pseudo-science, explore its historical roots, and explain in what way it is actually harmful to young people who are questioning what to make of life. Continue reading The Gay Related Complex, part 3: LGBT-psychology is a pseudo-science→
In our previous article in this series, we demonstrated that homosexuality does not exist as a separate entity. But before we expand on this, we need to understand why insights as these have become so highly contested in American society. Why do gay-lib activists insist that you were born this way and how has this unsubstantiated stance become mainstream? How can a century of psycho-analytic research have been silenced? To understand that, we need to explore the political context. Here is what happened and why. The content is shocking. Continue reading The Gay Related Complex, part 2: The social context→
The scientific understanding of Same-sex Attractions