In this article, we will demonstrate how the mechanism of cognitive dissonance, if well applied, is the road to indoctrination and thought-control. It is a mechanism that will conquer the mind, especially since using this technique will change the mind of the general public on their own accord. It surpasses rational thinking and fact-checking, and if well done, it is a winner. Continue reading LGBT propaganda, how do they do it?
Samuel Brinton has done it again. The poster-boy of the intolerant anti-psychiatry campaign has changed the story about his persona once more: we are now in September 2019 led to believe that he is an ex-gay. On NBC News, he is quoted saying:
“For a period of my life, I identified as ex-gay and came back out, and I wish people had been there to talk to me when I was ex-gay, because I felt rejected by both communities. I was rejected by the gay community, because they believed I was a hypocrite, and I was rejected by the straight community. It feels like the worst Venn diagram of your life, that neither side wants to claim you, Brinton said.”
In this article, we will demonstrate the many changes in his political spin over the years, and we will demonstrate how to spot a pathological liar. He is copycatting the rhetoric of other persons as though it happened to him personally; we have finally smoked him out. With his obsessive campaigns, he is doing a great deal of harm to a huge number of people, and the scam needs to be spelled out for all to see. Continue reading Samuel Brinton strikes yet once again: now he claims to be ‘ex-gay’
After a smear campaign in June 2019, the ‘Born That Way’ ideology reigns at Amazon. All other views are on their way out. It was organized by radical-gay members of the American Psychological Association. The LGBT mantra of ‘look how inclusive we are!’ is clearly fake. Here is an overview of some of the books that are now exclusively permitted, thanks to the APA. These writers can only prove their point by portraying same-sex attractions as purely an animalistic drive like a dumb gorilla. Then this allows each book to pluck conveniently from the animal kingdom and expand the results to human behavior. In doing so, human psychology is thrown out of the narrative. But what if a female spider due to its bodily lust eats its male partner after intercourse as many do, what does THAT say about the human race? Continue reading The books that Amazon does not delete: the ‘Born That Way’ ideology, ‘Mein Kampf’, and ‘4 Ways to commit Suicide’.
Amazon and Wordery have been led by the American Psychological Association (APA) to remove all books related in any way to therapy for exploring sexual identity problems. The APA managed to manipulate two total amateurs in this field to take the blame, while the professionals from their backseat supply the strategy and ammunition. They now look on and avoid the heat. It worked like a charm. No client is to read anything about his/her sexuality unless it is approved by the radical left-wing APA. Continue reading Gay extremists manipulate Amazon and Wordery into deleting all therapy books
In 1969, gay activist George Weinberg attributed an imaginary ‘phobia’ to people of any opposing view. Since then, a new term has risen on the horizon: ‘diversity’. If ‘Homophobia’ was strong language in 1969, the new-millenium-language is even stronger. This ‘diversity’ embraces everybody except, of course, the demonized and the persecuted who are not considered or defended as a part of the diversity spectrum. The flags are so big, that they can only be meant to tell others off and to be intimidating. What is this ‘Diversity’ anyway? Continue reading A unifying theory of the term ‘homophobia’, part 5: The Diversity Hoax
In January 2019, psychotherapist Dr. Dovid Schwartz from Boston filed a federal lawsuit against the city of New York for violating his freedom of speech, and infringing on his faith and that of his patients. He is challenging the city’s new ordinance that prohibits certain patient-counselor conversations that the New York City Council recently chose to disfavor. The court needs to protect him from being legally forced to choose between risking severe financial penalties on the one hand or on the other, self-censoring his conversation with patients in a manner that denies them the assistance they desire. In this article, we demonstrate the case and what Dr. Schwartz courageously says about it. In doing so, he speaks for millions of other people across the world. He is not alone. Continue reading Psychotherapist challenges NYC’s censorship of private conversations with adult patients
With the nearing of yet again another activist ‘International Day Against Homophobia’ on May 17, the word ‘homophobia’ is central stage. But what to come up with this time? Usually, radical gay-lib highlights foreign legislation’s where homosexual acts between consenting adults are considered illegal. Gay-lib elicits rage by inciting the crowds with fantasies of people being tossed from walls by goggle-eyed imams, and as a result an irrational power emerges. As always, these strong feelings are then diverted to their own country for domestic use, even though homosexual behavior is not illegal in the West. With adrenaline now flowing through blood vessels, any objections to radical gay-lib campaigns in their own country can be hunted down and punished. Continue reading A unifying theory of the term ‘homophobia’, part 4: Gay-lib is running out of gas
Homophobia is part of the ideology of homosexism, and its use implies that homosexuality actually exists as a separate physical entity and that hence people can be labeled ‘homosexual’. By using the word ‘homophobia’, the speaker is forced to conform to that mind-frame, whether he agrees or not. The term has great negative political implications for society. The flag size grows bigger by the year, as does repression of other views on sexuality. Continue reading A unifying theory of the term ‘homophobia’, part 3: the political perspective
The psychological approach to understanding the use of the term ‘homophobia’ raises questions. To what extent are gay activists merely faking to read other people’s mind, and to what extent is this a projection of their own phobias towards sexual intimacy with the opposite sex and of their own hostile attitude? To what extent is the term ‘homophobia’ no more than a cheap abuse of psychology, and in which way is this abuse becoming a deadly weapon in the persecution of dissident thought to secure supremacy in the Western narrative? Continue reading A unifying theory of the term ‘homophobia’, part 2: the psychological perspective
Let us jump right into the thick of it: homophobia does not exist. The term is a social construct and is a projection of the hatred and mistrust towards society that has been generated within the radical gay movement, which started around 1970. By projecting your hatred and heterophobia onto the other guy, your conscience is clear and pure. And the other guy is as guilty as they come. All we then need to do is to hunt for grievances. Continue reading A unifying theory of the term “homophobia”, part 1: the historical perspective