Many people, even in the medical establishment, are now seen to be caving in to the relentness attacks on scientific paradigms by a group of radical American lawfirms. Moderate thinking is being removed from scientific research and education. The latest example is the once prestigious and reliable New England Medical Journal, which published an article declaring biological sex irrelevant. We read how the mere word “biological sex” is treated as if it were “offensive” to 0.2% of the population, a fringe group of deeply conflicted individuals who label themselves as “transgender” forefront activists. By removing the word ‘anatomical sex’ from birth certificates, the mental confusion then seems to be less conflicted. Biological sex, so society is increasingly led to believe, would be merely “an option”.
The opinion editor of The Washington Examiner, Brad Polumbo, writes on the 16th of March 2020: “As if we needed more evidence that progressive, identity politics activism is a grift, several left-wing groups that fundraise off of gay and transgender rights are greedily trying to turn the coronavirus into a victimhood issue. A letter that was constructed is just another cynical attempt by left-wing gay and transgender activist organizations to fuel the fake victimhood narrative they need to keep their donor base engaged.” Continue reading No, coronavirus is not an ‘LGBTQ’ victimhood issue→
In this article, British writer Belinda Brown investigates the consequences of embedding new and radical ‘lgbt’-ideology in the school curriculum. She investigates the scientific facts about same-sex attractions, and concludes that an accurately informed decision making process should be encouraged, instead of blindly promoting homosexuality as an indifferent affair. “This is the direction in which we should be guiding our young people. But that won’t happen while the LGBT lobby is in charge”, so she argues. Continue reading The risk of lgbt-ideology in school curriculum→
After a smear campaign in June 2019, the ‘Born That Way’ ideology reigns at Amazon. All other views are on their way out. It was organized by radical-gay members of the American Psychological Association. The LGBT mantra of ‘look how inclusive we are!’ is clearly fake. Here is an overview of some of the books that are now exclusively permitted, thanks to the APA. These writers can only prove their point by portraying same-sex attractions as purely an animalistic drive like a dumb gorilla. Then this allows each book to pluck conveniently from the animal kingdom and expand the results to human behavior. In doing so, human psychology is thrown out of the narrative. But what if a female spider due to its bodily lust eats its male partner after intercourse as many do, what does THAT say about the human race? Continue reading The books that Amazon does not delete: the ‘Born That Way’ ideology, ‘Mein Kampf’, and ‘4 Ways to commit Suicide’.→
Amazon and Wordery have been led by the American Psychological Association (APA) to remove all books related in any way to therapy for exploring sexual identity problems. The APA managed to manipulate two total amateurs in this field to take the blame, while the professionals from their backseat supply the strategy and ammunition. They now look on and avoid the heat. It worked like a charm. No client is to read anything about his/her sexuality unless it is approved by the radical left-wing APA. Continue reading Gay extremists manipulate Amazon and Wordery into deleting all therapy books→
In January 2019, psychotherapist Dr. DovidSchwartz from Boston filed a federal lawsuit against the city of New York for violating his freedom of speech, and infringing on his faith and that of his patients. He is challenging the city’s new ordinance that prohibits certain patient-counselor conversations that the New York City Council recently chose to disfavor. The court needs to protect him from being legally forced to choose between risking severe financial penalties on the one hand or on the other, self-censoring his conversation with patients in a manner that denies them the assistance they desire. In this article, we demonstrate the case and what Dr. Schwartz courageously says about it. In doing so, he speaks for millions of other people across the world. He is not alone.Continue reading Psychotherapist challenges NYC’s censorship of private conversations with adult patients→
David van Gend is a Queensland doctor and president of the Australian Marriage Forum. At the Church and State Summit in Brisbane in February 2019, he gave a talk about the current situation in the Australian state of Victoria. The new Labour Party premier Daniel Andrews is currently doing his share of work for the therapy-ban, which the National Center of Lesbian Rights in San Francisco called for in 2014. “If there are no spontaneous complaints, then find them”, such is the campaign slogan.
A biased study group found just 15 disgruntled Australians with bad outdated stories to tell about so-called “religious conversion therapy”. They never interviewed persons who were not disgruntled, and who had perhaps happily left the LGBT-world behind them. This was not a study seeking academic balance; it was a hit job on pastors, doctors and counsellors who dare to defy LGBT orthodoxy.
In this article, we will analyze how the radical factions within the Gay Liberation Front have evolved over the last five decades and have managed to monopolize public opinion and are seeking to marginalize all dissidence, even within the emancipation movement. Then we will suggest how persons with moderate views can regain the initiative for compassionate client care. Continue reading The Bastion Of Gay-lib Supremacy And Ways To Scale The Walls→
On the 23rd of July 2018, Delaware governor John Carney (D) signed a law prohibiting medical and mental health professionals in the state from practicing or referring ‘conversion’ therapy for minors. The initiative did not come from any clients in Delaware but from gay-lib extremists from outside. Earlier this year, state Rep. Richard Collins (Republican Party – Millsboro) introduced an amendment to the bill that would have allowed conversion therapy if a patient requests it. In doing so, the self-determination of clients would have been protected by law. But the amendment did not pass due to the Democratic Party.